DOI 10.1016/j.chiabu.2026.107889
Exploring the relationship between depressive and aggressive-defiant symptoms across child maltreatment subtypes: A network analysis approach.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Child maltreatment (CM) often results in the co-occurrence of depressive and aggressive-defiant symptoms. However, it remains unclear whether the symptom relationships and putative directionality of these symptoms vary according to CM subtype.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined the symptom network and potential directionality of depressive and aggressive-defiant symptoms in physically abused, emotionally abused, and neglected children in South Korea.
PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING
From a nationwide repository, we analyzed cross-sectional data of 3384 children officially identified as victims of CM by a child protection agency.
METHODS
For each CM subtype, Gaussian graphical models identified central and bridge symptoms, whereas directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) analyses inferred directionality among depressive and aggressive-defiant symptoms.
RESULTS
Anger-related symptoms were the most common across CM subtypes. Negative self-concept symptoms were the most central symptoms in the physical and emotional abuse networks, whereas depressive mood and negative interpersonal feedback were the key symptoms in the neglect network. Irritability consistently served as a key bridge symptom linking the two symptom clusters. Negative interpersonal feedback was also a significant bridge between emotional abuse and neglect network symptoms. DAG analyses revealed the subtype-specific putative directionality of comorbidities.
CONCLUSION
CM subtype distinctly shaped the interrelations and directionality of depressive and aggressive-defiant symptoms. Interventions targeting identified central and bridging symptoms may improve tailored treatment approaches.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.