Political determinants of US states' screening-amenable cancer stage at diagnosis and premature cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND

Political determinants of cancer risk are largely unexplored, conceptually and empirically.

METHODS

Observational analysis of associations present in 2017-2021 between 5 state-level political metrics and 4 age-standardized cancer outcomes (regional and distant stage at diagnosis for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer among screening-age adults and premature cancer mortality), overall and in standardized linear regression models adjusting for state-level poverty and medical uninsurance.

RESULTS

In fully adjusted models (adjusted for state-level poverty and state-level medical uninsurance variables: % working age adults [age 35-64] without medical insurance; number of years of state Medicaid expansion), each 1 SD shift toward a more liberal political ideology (measured by voting record) among elected officials in the US House of Representatives was associated with decreased risk of diagnosis with regional and distant breast and colorectal cancer (respectively: -0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.26 to -0.25; -0.75; 95% CI = -1.5 to 0). Risk of premature cancer mortality likewise was lower, in the fully adjusted models, with each 1 SD shift toward more liberal scores for the state electoral college vote (-2.01, 95% CI = -3.68 to -0.33), the state liberalism policy index (-2.51, 95% CI = -4.48 to -0.54), and political ideology of elected officials in the US Senate (-1.93, 95% CI = -3.71 to -0.14).

CONCLUSION

Our state-level analyses suggest that political metrics are associated with preventable cancer outcomes. Efforts to reduce population burdens of cancer and inequities in these burdens could benefit from analyses of sociopolitical drivers of cancer risk across the cancer continuum.