Journal of general internal medicine · 2025
Impact of a Multi-site Peer-led, Storytelling-based Workshop to Teach Resident Physicians About Healing After Medical Errors.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Azim Aniqa, Schnure Nilan, DiVeronica Matt, Rusek Max, Bird Amber, Smeraglio Andrea
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adverse psychological effects after medical errors are common, especially amongst residents.
AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a single workshop on resident comfort with, skills, and behavior change after medical error.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: PGY1 Internal Medicine residents at two residency programs.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We used constructivism to design a peer-led, storytelling-based workshop with semi-structured small group reflections. Surveys based on Kirkpatrick's framework were given pre- and post-workshop and one site conducted a 1-year follow up survey.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: In 2023, 68 residents completed the workshop and survey, for a response rate of 90.1% (68/73). There was an increase in self-reported skills around recognizing (41% pre-, 75% post-, p = 0.001) and overcoming (37% pre-, 76% post-, p < 0.001) the effects of being involved in medical errors. A 1-year follow up survey, response rate 76% (25/33), found 71% (17/24) of residents felt somewhat/very prepared to respond to the emotional impact of errors on others, 13/24 (54%) felt their response changed due to the single medical error workshop they attended. Content analysis found that change occurred through normalizing errors and empowering discussion.
DISCUSSION: A single peer-led storytelling-based workshop can increase resident comfort with and understanding of the effects of medical errors on physicians with lasting effect, and promote coping with, and healing from, these events.
AIM: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of a single workshop on resident comfort with, skills, and behavior change after medical error.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: PGY1 Internal Medicine residents at two residency programs.
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: We used constructivism to design a peer-led, storytelling-based workshop with semi-structured small group reflections. Surveys based on Kirkpatrick's framework were given pre- and post-workshop and one site conducted a 1-year follow up survey.
PROGRAM EVALUATION: In 2023, 68 residents completed the workshop and survey, for a response rate of 90.1% (68/73). There was an increase in self-reported skills around recognizing (41% pre-, 75% post-, p = 0.001) and overcoming (37% pre-, 76% post-, p < 0.001) the effects of being involved in medical errors. A 1-year follow up survey, response rate 76% (25/33), found 71% (17/24) of residents felt somewhat/very prepared to respond to the emotional impact of errors on others, 13/24 (54%) felt their response changed due to the single medical error workshop they attended. Content analysis found that change occurred through normalizing errors and empowering discussion.
DISCUSSION: A single peer-led storytelling-based workshop can increase resident comfort with and understanding of the effects of medical errors on physicians with lasting effect, and promote coping with, and healing from, these events.