MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fneur.2026.1884713

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in neurology · 2026

Comparative efficacy of AAC and ibuprofen versus lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mitra Ashoke, Franks Billy, Petruschke Richard, Dhiman Abhijeet, Bansal Nitu

СтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A range of pharmacologic options is available for acute migraine treatment, yet the efficacy and safety of commonly used over-the-counter (OTC) therapies relative to newer prescription agents remain unclear. Given the scarcity of direct head-to-head trials, this network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated selected OTC therapies against newer oral agents, including CGRP antagonists and the 5-HT1F receptor agonist.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL for RCTs of acute migraine therapies published between January 1990 and July 2025. Primary outcomes were 2-h (2 h) pain relief and pain freedom; secondary outcomes included 2-h photophobia, phonophobia and nausea. Effect sizes were calculated as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A frequentist NMA was conducted to estimate comparative efficacy and safety across the treatment network.

RESULTS

This NMA synthesized evidence from 25 RCTs, including 5 different interventions across 19 dose categories, involving a total of 22,100 participants with migraine. Compared with placebo, acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine (AAC) combination showed superior 2 h pain relief (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.61-1.94; p-score = 0.96), followed by ibuprofen 400 mg and 200 mg. For 2 h pain freedom, AAC, ibuprofen 400 mg, and lasmiditan 200 mg showed broadly comparable favorable effects versus placebo, with similar RRs and p-scores. AAC also produced the greatest reductions in photophobia and phonophobia at 2 h (photophobia: RR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.62-2.45; p-score = 0.97; phonophobia: RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.28-1.84; p-score = 0.89), while ibuprofen Liquigel 400 mg provided additional meaningful benefit. For nausea, rimegepant 75 mg demonstrated the strongest effect (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.08-1.22; p-score = 0.85), followed by ibuprofen Liquigel 400 mg and AAC.

CONCLUSION

In this NMA, OTC therapies showed meaningful efficacy and favorable safety for acute episodic migraine versus placebo, with ibuprofen and AAC demonstrating consistent benefits across 2 h pain and secondary outcomes. These findings support their use as effective, accessible options alongside newer oral agents. Larger trials and patient-level analyses are needed to refine efficacy, optimize dosing, and personalize migraine management.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261325571, Identifier CRD420261325571.

Для цитирования: Mitra Ashoke, Franks Billy, Petruschke Richard, Dhiman Abhijeet, Bansal Nitu. Comparative efficacy of AAC and ibuprofen versus lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of episodic migraine in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.. Frontiers in neurology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1884713.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.