International journal of sports physiology and performance · 2026
Reliability of a Triathlon-Specific Test Protocol to Assess Physiological Determinants of Fatigued Running Performance.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Keller Sebastian, Röhrs Greta, Wahl Patrick
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Given the growing evidence of the importance of durability in endurance performance, this study aimed to investigate the reliability of a triathlon-specific test protocol for assessing physiological determinants of fatigued running performance, that is, after strenuous cycling in well-trained triathletes of both sexes.
METHODS: On 2 occasions, 10 triathletes (5 females; maximal oxygen uptake [V˙O2peak] 60.4 [6.0] mL·min-1·kg-1) completed an incremental cycling test (∼2 W·kg-1, +20 W, 3 min) to exhaustion followed by a constant-workload segment at 85% of power at lactate threshold 2 (LT2) to reach 20 kJ·kg-1 (males) or 15 kJ·kg-1 (females) of total mechanical work. Subsequently, they performed an incremental running test to exhaustion (2.8 m·s-1, +0.4 m·s-1, 5 min + 30-s rest) to assess fatigued V˙O2peak, oxygen cost, and lactate thresholds. Energy expenditure and carbohydrate/fat oxidation were calculated during all submaximal work rates.
RESULTS: All diagnostic determinants of fatigued running performance showed good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ .845), except for fractional utilization of V˙O2peak at LT2 (ICC = .193), along with small measurement errors (typical error ≤ 3.6%) for all determinants. In contrast to the excellent reliability of energy expenditure during constant-workload cycling (ICC = .940, typical error = 3.4%), substrate oxidation demonstrated limited reliability during constant cycling and submaximal fatigued running (ICC = .560-.928, typical error = 6.3%-19.6%).
CONCLUSION: The triathlon-specific test protocol demonstrated high reliability for measures of fatigued running performance, comparable to fresh measurements in previous reliability studies, making it suitable for regular evaluation of triathletes.
METHODS: On 2 occasions, 10 triathletes (5 females; maximal oxygen uptake [V˙O2peak] 60.4 [6.0] mL·min-1·kg-1) completed an incremental cycling test (∼2 W·kg-1, +20 W, 3 min) to exhaustion followed by a constant-workload segment at 85% of power at lactate threshold 2 (LT2) to reach 20 kJ·kg-1 (males) or 15 kJ·kg-1 (females) of total mechanical work. Subsequently, they performed an incremental running test to exhaustion (2.8 m·s-1, +0.4 m·s-1, 5 min + 30-s rest) to assess fatigued V˙O2peak, oxygen cost, and lactate thresholds. Energy expenditure and carbohydrate/fat oxidation were calculated during all submaximal work rates.
RESULTS: All diagnostic determinants of fatigued running performance showed good to excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] ≥ .845), except for fractional utilization of V˙O2peak at LT2 (ICC = .193), along with small measurement errors (typical error ≤ 3.6%) for all determinants. In contrast to the excellent reliability of energy expenditure during constant-workload cycling (ICC = .940, typical error = 3.4%), substrate oxidation demonstrated limited reliability during constant cycling and submaximal fatigued running (ICC = .560-.928, typical error = 6.3%-19.6%).
CONCLUSION: The triathlon-specific test protocol demonstrated high reliability for measures of fatigued running performance, comparable to fresh measurements in previous reliability studies, making it suitable for regular evaluation of triathletes.