Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fernstad Jonatan, Svennberg Emma, Åberg Peter, Kemp Gudmundsdottir Katrin, Jansson Anders, Engdahl Johan
Аннотация
AIMS: The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of an automatic machine learning (ML) algorithm for heart rhythm diagnostics using smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) recorded by patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) pericardioversion in an unsupervised ambulatory setting.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing cardioversion for AF or AFL performed 1-min heart rhythm recordings pericardioversion at least twice daily for 4-6 weeks, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running a PPG application (CORAI Heart Monitor) simultaneously with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (KardiaMobile). The algorithm uses support vector machines to classify heart rhythm from smartphone-PPG. The algorithm was trained on PPG recordings made by patients in a separate cardioversion cohort. Photoplethysmography recordings in the external validation cohort were analysed by the algorithm. Diagnostic performance was calculated by comparing the heart rhythm classification output to the diagnosis from the simultaneous ECG recordings (gold standard). In total, 460 patients performed 34 097 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings, divided into 180 patients with 16 092 recordings in the training cohort and 280 patients with 18 005 recordings in the external validation cohort. Algorithmic classification of the PPG recordings in the external validation cohort diagnosed AF with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively, and AF/AFL with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.3%, 99.1% and 99.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A machine learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from smartphone-PPG recordings in an unsupervised ambulatory setting, minimizing the need for manual review and ECG verification, in elderly cardioversion populations.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04300270.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing cardioversion for AF or AFL performed 1-min heart rhythm recordings pericardioversion at least twice daily for 4-6 weeks, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running a PPG application (CORAI Heart Monitor) simultaneously with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (KardiaMobile). The algorithm uses support vector machines to classify heart rhythm from smartphone-PPG. The algorithm was trained on PPG recordings made by patients in a separate cardioversion cohort. Photoplethysmography recordings in the external validation cohort were analysed by the algorithm. Diagnostic performance was calculated by comparing the heart rhythm classification output to the diagnosis from the simultaneous ECG recordings (gold standard). In total, 460 patients performed 34 097 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings, divided into 180 patients with 16 092 recordings in the training cohort and 280 patients with 18 005 recordings in the external validation cohort. Algorithmic classification of the PPG recordings in the external validation cohort diagnosed AF with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively, and AF/AFL with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.3%, 99.1% and 99.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A machine learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from smartphone-PPG recordings in an unsupervised ambulatory setting, minimizing the need for manual review and ECG verification, in elderly cardioversion populations.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04300270.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansAtrial FibrillationPhotoplethysmographySmartphoneMaleFemaleAgedMiddle AgedAtrial FlutterHeart RateReproducibility of ResultsPredictive Value of TestsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyElectric CountershockSupport Vector MachineAlgorithmsMachine LearningMobile ApplicationsElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryClassification Algorithms