The Central African journal of medicine · 2010
Low level technology tool (LLTT) in screening for blindness: test qualities in the outpatients department of a tertiary eye unit using the Snellen chart.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Masanganise R, Rusakaniko S, Manjonjori N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of finger counting (low level technology tool) in screening for blindness in the outpatients department of a tertiary eye unit with the view of employing the test for screening illiterate people in hard to reach parts of the country where the conventional visual acuity charts are not available.
DESIGN: Aperformance evaluation of counting fingers (LLTT) in screening for blindness against the standard test (Snellen chart).
SETTING: Sekuru Kaguvi Eye Unit, Parirenyatwa Hospital, Zimbabwe.
SUBJECTS: Patients presenting to the Eye Outpatient Department at Sekuru Kaguvi Eye Unit with various eye problems.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity of low level technology tool (LLTT) in identifying blind people.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of LLTT in detecting blindness in all age groups combined was 100% and 88.5% respectively. Although sensitivity was not affected by patient age, specificity decreased with increasing age. The overall positive predictive value for the test was 53.3% and the prevalence of blindness among outpatient attendees was 11.6%.
CONCLUSION: Finger counting is an effective tool that can be employed in screening for blindness in communities which are hard to reach, have low literacy rate and when conventional methods of testing visual acuity are not available.
DESIGN: Aperformance evaluation of counting fingers (LLTT) in screening for blindness against the standard test (Snellen chart).
SETTING: Sekuru Kaguvi Eye Unit, Parirenyatwa Hospital, Zimbabwe.
SUBJECTS: Patients presenting to the Eye Outpatient Department at Sekuru Kaguvi Eye Unit with various eye problems.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sensitivity of low level technology tool (LLTT) in identifying blind people.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of LLTT in detecting blindness in all age groups combined was 100% and 88.5% respectively. Although sensitivity was not affected by patient age, specificity decreased with increasing age. The overall positive predictive value for the test was 53.3% and the prevalence of blindness among outpatient attendees was 11.6%.
CONCLUSION: Finger counting is an effective tool that can be employed in screening for blindness in communities which are hard to reach, have low literacy rate and when conventional methods of testing visual acuity are not available.