The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness · 2024
Effects of fan cooling with an air-perfused rucksack on physiological and perceptual strains in young men while running in uncompensable hot environment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kajiki Masanobu, Yamashita Naoyuki, Matsumoto Takaaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.
METHODS: Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O<inf>2peak</inf> for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.
RESULTS: Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.
METHODS: Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O<inf>2peak</inf> for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.
RESULTS: Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.