Respiratory care · 2023
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Screening Chest Radiographs in a Pediatric ICU.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Malin Stefan W, Maue Danielle K, Cater Daniel T, Ealy Aimee R, McCallister Anne E, Valentine Kevin M, Abu-Sultaneh Samer M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Critical Care Societies Collaborative included not ordering diagnostic tests at regular intervals as one of their Choosing Wisely initiatives. A reduction in unnecessary chest radiographs (CXRs) can help reduce exposure to radiation and eliminate health care waste. We aimed to reduce daily screening CXRs in a pediatric ICU (PICU) by 20% from baseline within 4 months of implementation of CXR criteria.
METHODS: All intubated patients in the PICU were included in this quality improvement project. Patients with tracheostomies were excluded. We developed criteria delineating which patients were most likely to benefit from a daily screening CXR, and these criteria were discussed for each patient on rounds. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or on high support on conventional mechanical ventilation were included as needing a daily screening CXR. We tracked the percentage of intubated subjects receiving a screening CXR as an outcome measure. Unplanned extubations and the number of non-screening CXRs per intubated subject were followed as balancing measures.
RESULTS: The percentage of intubated subjects receiving a daily screening CXR was reduced from 79% to 31%. There was no increase in frequency of unplanned extubations or number of non-screening CXRs. With an estimated subject charge of roughly $270 and hospital cost of $54 per CXR, this project led to an estimated $300,000 in patient charge savings and $60,000 in hospital cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Adopting criteria to delineate which patients are most likely to benefit from screening CXRs can lead to a reduction in the percentage of intubated patients receiving screening CXRs without appearing to increase harm.
METHODS: All intubated patients in the PICU were included in this quality improvement project. Patients with tracheostomies were excluded. We developed criteria delineating which patients were most likely to benefit from a daily screening CXR, and these criteria were discussed for each patient on rounds. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, on high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, or on high support on conventional mechanical ventilation were included as needing a daily screening CXR. We tracked the percentage of intubated subjects receiving a screening CXR as an outcome measure. Unplanned extubations and the number of non-screening CXRs per intubated subject were followed as balancing measures.
RESULTS: The percentage of intubated subjects receiving a daily screening CXR was reduced from 79% to 31%. There was no increase in frequency of unplanned extubations or number of non-screening CXRs. With an estimated subject charge of roughly $270 and hospital cost of $54 per CXR, this project led to an estimated $300,000 in patient charge savings and $60,000 in hospital cost savings.
CONCLUSIONS: Adopting criteria to delineate which patients are most likely to benefit from screening CXRs can lead to a reduction in the percentage of intubated patients receiving screening CXRs without appearing to increase harm.