MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12194-011-0117-2

Медицинская библиотека · Radiological physics and technology · 2011

Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.

Teramoto Atsushi, Kajihara Takahiko, Suzuki Shoichi, Kinoshita Kazuo, Tsuzaka Masatoshi, Fujita Hiroshi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The characteristics of flat-panel detectors (FPD) are degraded by exposure to radiation. Degradation in a FPD progresses locally and has a nonlinear relationship to the radiation dose. In order to manage FPD systems properly, one must perform quality control (QC) such as evaluation of image degradation. However, no evaluation method for degradation has been established. In this paper, we first review the structure and degradation mechanism of FPDs, and then we propose a daily QC system for FPDs. To evaluate the degradation of FPDs, we investigated the number of defective pixels and lines, as well as the offset level of the pixel output. Furthermore, we developed daily QC software for FPD that can evaluate the image quality and is operationally simple. In the experiments, an indirect-conversion type FPD was evaluated by our proposed system. The offset level of FPD increased exponentially with X-ray exposure; no trends were seen for the number of defective pixels and defective lines. The required time for the evaluation of an FPD was about 1 min, and no special skills were needed for the analysis. These results indicate that our system may be useful for daily QC of FPDs.

Для цитирования: Teramoto Atsushi, Kajihara Takahiko, Suzuki Shoichi, Kinoshita Kazuo, Tsuzaka Masatoshi, Fujita Hiroshi. Development of quality control system for flat-panel detectors.. Radiological physics and technology. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s12194-011-0117-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.