Psychiatric rehabilitation journal · 2021
Examining the need profile of supportive housing applicants with and without current justice involvement: A cross-sectional study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sirotich Frank, Rakhra Kamalpreet
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Permanent supportive housing has been identified as a possible intervention which could reduce the risk of criminal justice involvement (CJI) among people with serious mental illness who are experiencing residential instability and homelessness. However, the evidence evaluating the impact of supportive housing on CJI is mixed. Increasing understanding of the specific needs of people with justice involvement entering supportive housing may inform interventions which improve their criminal justice outcomes. Toward this end, this study compared the characteristics and need profiles of applicants to supportive housing with and without current CJI.
METHODS: Secondary analyses were conducted of archival databases of 12,277 individuals applying for supportive housing in Toronto, Canada between 2009 and 2015. The characteristics and support needs of applicants with current CJI were compared to applicants with no current justice involvement.
RESULTS: Of the applicants, 2,894 (23.6%) reported having justice involvement at the time of referral to supportive housing services. The strongest predictors of having justice involvement were a history of physical assaults, homelessness, problematic substance use, male gender, and younger age.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Criminological factors rather than functional or mental health needs were most predictive of having current justice involvement at referral. Development of justice-focused supportive housing models may be considered which supplement traditional supportive housing approaches with empirically based interventions targeting the criminogenic needs of people with mental illness and justice involvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
METHODS: Secondary analyses were conducted of archival databases of 12,277 individuals applying for supportive housing in Toronto, Canada between 2009 and 2015. The characteristics and support needs of applicants with current CJI were compared to applicants with no current justice involvement.
RESULTS: Of the applicants, 2,894 (23.6%) reported having justice involvement at the time of referral to supportive housing services. The strongest predictors of having justice involvement were a history of physical assaults, homelessness, problematic substance use, male gender, and younger age.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Criminological factors rather than functional or mental health needs were most predictive of having current justice involvement at referral. Development of justice-focused supportive housing models may be considered which supplement traditional supportive housing approaches with empirically based interventions targeting the criminogenic needs of people with mental illness and justice involvement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).