Journal of community psychology · 2019
Examining peer networking as a capacity-building strategy for Housing First implementation.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Worton S Kathleen
Аннотация
AIMS: This study examines peer networking as a capacity-building strategy for the implementation of Housing First (HF), a complex community intervention targeting chronic homelessness.
METHODS: A qualitative, multiple case study was conducted to examine the capacity-building activities of two, multicommunity peer networks established by community leaders in the Canadian Homelessness sector. Data collection activities included document analysis, key informant interviews (n = 10), and a follow-up focus group with interview participants in each network. Thematic analyses were conducted for each network, followed by a cross-case analysis.
RESULTS: Engaging in a multicommunity peer network enhances leaders' capacity to advance HF by creating opportunities to foster trust and communication, inform continuous improvement, and navigate ambiguity. A number of contextual factors influence connections between peer networking and capacity building.
CONCLUSION: Peer networks are a valuable source of support and timely, contextually relevant knowledge for community leaders advancing local adaptation and implementation of HF.
METHODS: A qualitative, multiple case study was conducted to examine the capacity-building activities of two, multicommunity peer networks established by community leaders in the Canadian Homelessness sector. Data collection activities included document analysis, key informant interviews (n = 10), and a follow-up focus group with interview participants in each network. Thematic analyses were conducted for each network, followed by a cross-case analysis.
RESULTS: Engaging in a multicommunity peer network enhances leaders' capacity to advance HF by creating opportunities to foster trust and communication, inform continuous improvement, and navigate ambiguity. A number of contextual factors influence connections between peer networking and capacity building.
CONCLUSION: Peer networks are a valuable source of support and timely, contextually relevant knowledge for community leaders advancing local adaptation and implementation of HF.