Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026
Eligibility criteria for the UK Winter Fuel Payment: are we targeting the right people?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wan Kai, Taylor Jonathon, Quijal-Zamorano Marcos, Ballester Joan, Hajat Shakoor
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cold weather remains a serious health threat in the UK and elsewhere, particularly for older adults. The Winter Fuel Payment has been a key government strategy to mitigate health risks linked to cold homes in the UK, but recent policy shifts have raised questions about whether income-based eligibility criteria effectively identify those most at risk.
METHODS: We analysed cold-related mortality in adults aged ≥75 across 324 local authority districts in England (2007-2019) using distributed lag non-linear models in a spatial Bayesian framework. Multivariate meta-regression was used to evaluate modification of cold effects by deprivation, income-based pension credit uptake, home energy efficiency and fuel poverty.
RESULTS: Areas in the highest quartile of fuel poverty had significantly greater cold-related mortality risk than those in the lowest quartile, with a 15.3% versus 13.1% increase in mortality risk at the first compared with the 50th percentile of wintertime temperature, ie, an absolute difference of 2.2% (p<0.001). This effect was stronger than the corresponding differences for energy efficiency (1.7%, p=0.04), income as indicated by pension credit uptake (0.6%, p=0.39) and deprivation-based measures, for which differences were minimal. Overall, an estimated 17% of cold-related deaths among people aged ≥75 were attributable to fuel poverty.
CONCLUSION: Fuel poverty, an indicator designed to capture both low-income and housing energy efficiency, is a stronger predictor of cold-related mortality than income (as indicated by pension credit update) or deprivation-based indicators alone. Winter energy support schemes should consider fuel poverty metrics in their targeting to more effectively reduce health risks associated with cold homes and improve equity.
METHODS: We analysed cold-related mortality in adults aged ≥75 across 324 local authority districts in England (2007-2019) using distributed lag non-linear models in a spatial Bayesian framework. Multivariate meta-regression was used to evaluate modification of cold effects by deprivation, income-based pension credit uptake, home energy efficiency and fuel poverty.
RESULTS: Areas in the highest quartile of fuel poverty had significantly greater cold-related mortality risk than those in the lowest quartile, with a 15.3% versus 13.1% increase in mortality risk at the first compared with the 50th percentile of wintertime temperature, ie, an absolute difference of 2.2% (p<0.001). This effect was stronger than the corresponding differences for energy efficiency (1.7%, p=0.04), income as indicated by pension credit uptake (0.6%, p=0.39) and deprivation-based measures, for which differences were minimal. Overall, an estimated 17% of cold-related deaths among people aged ≥75 were attributable to fuel poverty.
CONCLUSION: Fuel poverty, an indicator designed to capture both low-income and housing energy efficiency, is a stronger predictor of cold-related mortality than income (as indicated by pension credit update) or deprivation-based indicators alone. Winter energy support schemes should consider fuel poverty metrics in their targeting to more effectively reduce health risks associated with cold homes and improve equity.