Scientific reports · 2025
Comparison of endoscopic healing and durability between combination therapy with infliximab and azathioprine versus infliximab monotherapy in pediatric Crohn's disease.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim Yoon Zi, Kim Eun Sil, Kwon Yiyoung, Kim Seon Young, Kim Hansol, Choe Yon Ho, Kim Mi Jin
Аннотация
This retrospective observational study evaluated the effectiveness of endoscopic healing (EH) and the durability of infliximab (IFX) in combination with azathioprine (AZA) versus IFX monotherapy in pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). EH was assessed after 1 year of treatment, whereas IFX durability and associated risk factors were evaluated over an extended follow-up period. Data from 108 pediatric patients were analyzed by comparing the EH rates, IFX trough levels (TLs), antibody-to-IFX (ATIs), and IFX durability between the AZA combination therapy (combination therapy group) and IFX monotherapy (monotherapy group) groups. Of the 108 patients who received IFX therapy, 85 (78.7%) received AZA combination therapy, and 23 (21.3%) received IFX monotherapy. The combination therapy group demonstrated superior EH rates (78.6 vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001), higher IFX TLs (4.6 µg/mL vs. 3.9 µg/mL, p = 0.016), lower ATI positivity (25.0% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.025), and prolonged IFX durability than the monotherapy group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that ATI positivity (hazard ratio [HR] 5.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-17.60, p = 0.006) and combination therapy with IFX and AZA (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.51, p = 0.004) were associated with IFX durability.