DOI 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.10.009
Validity and Reliability Assessment of a Food and Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents From Low-Income Communities.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Develop and validate an evaluation questionnaire for sixth-12th grade Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) participants.
DESIGN
Five-step process: domain concept prioritization, question generation, question pretesting, reliability testing, and criterion validity testing.
SETTING
Community sites in 4 states and New Jersey EFNEP secondary program data.
PARTICIPANTS
Nineteen sixth-12th graders were interviewed; secondary data included 164 ninth-12th graders.
VARIABLES MEASURED: Content, face, and criterion validity; internal reliability.
ANALYSIS: Iterative template analysis to gauge conceptual understanding; exploratory factor analysis with orthogonal Varimax rotation, interitem correlations, and Cronbach α; Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman plots against the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents and Youth Risk Behavior Survey questions.
RESULTS
Fourteen questions with acceptable face validity were developed. One item (handwashing) had a ceiling effect and was removed. Eleven of the remaining 13 items were loaded onto 4 factors. The remaining 2 items were kept because of conceptual relevance. The questionnaire demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity overall, but subscale Cronbach α values ranged from 0.53-0.75.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This 13-item questionnaire was presented to national EFNEP program leaders and was implemented by EFNEP in October 2023. Further research could establish temporal reliability and gold standard criterion validity estimates with a multistate sample of sixth through 12th graders.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.