MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10979-008-9140-1

Медицинская библиотека · Law and human behavior · 2008

Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems.

Skeem Jennifer, Eno Louden Jennifer, Manchak Sarah, Vidal Sarah, Haddad Eileen

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems (PCPs) are both subject to considerable social control, and at high risk of probation failure. In this study, we screened 601 probationers for symptoms, interviewed 82 identified PCPs about their relationships, and then followed these PCPs for eight months to record treatment nonadherence and other probation violations. First, PCPs' social networks were small, heavily comprised of professionals and opposing forces who engaged in risky behavior, and saturated with pressure to adhere to treatment. Second, the size and composition of PCPs' social networks were more relevant to rule compliance than social support and undermining. Third, the quality of PCPs' relationships was key: satisfying relationships with clinicians and, to a lesser extent, officers and the core network related to low perceived coercion, high treatment adherence, and low risk of future violations. In particular, having a likable clinician who engaged in participatory decision-making reduced the risk of violations. Implications for contextually sensitive risk reduction efforts are discussed.

Для цитирования: Skeem Jennifer, Eno Louden Jennifer, Manchak Sarah, Vidal Sarah, Haddad Eileen. Social networks and social control of probationers with co-occurring mental and substance abuse problems.. Law and human behavior. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-008-9140-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.