MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01044.x

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of educational psychology · 1993

Vygotsky and Papert: social-cognitive interactions within Logo environments.

Mevarech Z R, Kramarski B

Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of co-operative and individualised Logo environments on creativity and interpersonal relationships regarding academic recognition and social acceptance. Participants were 83 students who studied in three eighth grade classrooms: one was exposed to a co-operative Logo environment (N = 30), the other to an individualised Logo environment (N = 24), and the third served as a non-treatment control group (N = 29). Results showed that students in the cooperative Logo environment outperformed their counterparts in the other two groups on certain measures of creativity (figurative-originality, verbal-flexibility, and verbal-originality). In addition, the co-operative Logo group developed more positive interpersonal relationships than the students in the other two settings. The results are discussed from three perspectives: the social-cognitive approach emphasising the roles of co-operation and metacognition in developing advanced thinking skills; the educational-technology viewpoint demonstrating the potential use of computers; and the pedagogical view pointing out the implications of the study to school situations and heterogeneous classrooms.

Для цитирования: Mevarech Z R, Kramarski B. Vygotsky and Papert: social-cognitive interactions within Logo environments.. The British journal of educational psychology. 1993. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01044.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.