MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12889-026-26312-9

Медицинская библиотека · BMC public health · 2026

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) measurement tools among children and adolescents in the Arab world: a scoping review.

Elshaikh Usra, Hassan Diana Alsayed, Daher-Nashif Suhad, Khaled Salma M, Abdul Rahim Hanan F

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) significantly impact long-term health, yet culturally adapted measurement tools for Arab children and adolescents remain scarce.

OBJECTIVES

This scoping review systematically mapped ACEs assessment tools used in the Arab world, identifying key instruments and gaps.

METHODS

Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines, six databases were searched (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) up to August 31st, 2025, including English and Arabic studies from 22 Arab countries.

RESULTS

Of 19,714 screened records, 96 met inclusion criteria. Findings revealed diverse tools, with physical and emotional abuse most frequently assessed. Most studies were conducted in educational settings, while clinical and community contexts were underrepresented. Notably, few tools were validated or reliably adapted for Arab populations.

CONCLUSION

The review underscores the need for culturally tailored psychometrically robust ACEs measures to improve assessment accuracy and intervention relevance in the Arab world. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: Research registry reviewregistry1763.

Для цитирования: Elshaikh Usra, Hassan Diana Alsayed, Daher-Nashif Suhad, Khaled Salma M, Abdul Rahim Hanan F. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) measurement tools among children and adolescents in the Arab world: a scoping review.. BMC public health. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-026-26312-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.