MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112733

Медицинская библиотека · Annual review of clinical psychology · 2015

Thinking about rumination: the scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan Nolen-Hoeksema.

Lyubomirsky Sonja, Layous Kristin, Chancellor Joseph, Nelson S Katherine

БиографияИсторическая статьяСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our article reviews and celebrates Susan Nolen-Hoeksema's remarkable contributions to psychological and clinical science, focusing on her vast body of theoretical and empirical work and her influence on colleagues and students. Susan spent her career trying to understand how and why a style of regulating emotions called rumination increases vulnerability to depression and exacerbates and perpetuates negative moods. More broadly, we describe research by Susan and her colleagues on the predictors of depression in childhood and adolescence; gender differences in depression and rumination in adolescence and adulthood; roots, correlates, and adverse consequences of ruminative response styles; and rumination as a transdiagnostic risk factor for not only depression but also a host of psychological disorders, including anxiety, substance abuse, and eating disorders. Susan's intellectual legacy is evident in her impressive publication and citation record, the clinical applications of her work, and the flourishing careers of the students she mentored.

Для цитирования: Lyubomirsky Sonja, Layous Kristin, Chancellor Joseph, Nelson S Katherine. Thinking about rumination: the scholarly contributions and intellectual legacy of Susan Nolen-Hoeksema.. Annual review of clinical psychology. 2015. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112733.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.