MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1077559508326287

Медицинская библиотека · Child maltreatment · 2008

At-risk and maltreated children exposed to intimate partner aggression/violence: what the conflict looks like and its relationship to child outcomes.

English Diana J, Graham J Christopher, Newton Rae R, Lewis Terri L, Thompson Richard, Kotch Jonathan B, Weisbart Cindy

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Despite increasing research on children's exposure to intimate partner aggression/violence (IPAV), and co-occurrence of IPAV and maltreatment, little is known about IPAV in at-risk and maltreating families. We explored the nature of IPAV in 554 homes where children were identified as at risk or reported for maltreatment and examined differences between emotional and behavioral outcomes for children in homes where one or both intimate partners is the alleged perpetrator of IPAV. We found in this sample that IPAV primarily took the form of verbal aggression with differences in perpetrator gender for verbal, minor, and severe violence. There were few child outcomes predicted by perpetrator gender: Significant child behavior problems were found with all types of IPAV and both genders as perpetrators. Results suggest the need for comprehensive assessments of IPAV when assessing risk, safety, and harm issues for children reported as being at risk or victims of maltreatment.

Для цитирования: English Diana J, Graham J Christopher, Newton Rae R, Lewis Terri L, Thompson Richard, Kotch Jonathan B, Weisbart Cindy. At-risk and maltreated children exposed to intimate partner aggression/violence: what the conflict looks like and its relationship to child outcomes.. Child maltreatment. 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1077559508326287.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.