Drug design, development and therapy · 2026
Single-Injection Liposomal Bupivacaine Adductor Canal Block for Pain Control and Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Double‑Blinded Study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wen Jiajun, Peng Haobin, Jiang Ying, Chen Manli, Ou Jianxin, Huang Weitao, Li Peixing, Zhou Jun, Wu Xianping
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of the adductor canal block (ACB) in multimodal analgesia following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This study investigates the effects of local anesthetics single-injection ACB with different analgesic durations on TKA patients.
METHODS: This randomized controlled double‑blinded trial enrolled 90 patients undergoing primary TKA. Participants were randomized to receive ACB with either liposomal bupivacaine (LB), ropivacaine (15 mL of 0.3%), or in the control group, with 30 patients in each group. The primary end points included the static and dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary end points examined the static and dynamic pain scores at 6,12,48, and 72 hours postoperatively; the knee range of motion (ROM); quadriceps muscle strength; duration to first ambulation; opioid consumption; and related adverse events.
RESULTS: Patients administered a LB single-injection ACB (LB-ACB) demonstrated significantly reduced VAS scores at static and dynamic phases at 24 hours, relative to the ropivacaine single-injection ACB (R-ACB) and control group patients. We recorded a median interquartile range [IQR] of 1 (0.0-2.0 [0-4]) vs. 3 (2.0-4.0 [0-5]) vs. 3 (2.0-4.0 [0-6]) for static pain scores and 2.5 (1.0-3.25 [0-5]) vs. 4 (4.0-5.0 [2-7]) vs. 5 (4.0-6.0 [3-7]) for dynamic pain scores (P<0.001). Both LB-ACB and R-ACB groups showed lower pain scores at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively versus control (P<0.05). Time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged in the LB group, and LB-ACB also improved early quadriceps strength and knee ROM. No significant adverse events or motor blockade occurred.
CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing TKA, LB single-injection ACB offers a significant analgesic advantage compared to ropivacaine, lasting up to 24 hours. After 48 hours, there is no difference in analgesic effects when compared to the control group.
METHODS: This randomized controlled double‑blinded trial enrolled 90 patients undergoing primary TKA. Participants were randomized to receive ACB with either liposomal bupivacaine (LB), ropivacaine (15 mL of 0.3%), or in the control group, with 30 patients in each group. The primary end points included the static and dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary end points examined the static and dynamic pain scores at 6,12,48, and 72 hours postoperatively; the knee range of motion (ROM); quadriceps muscle strength; duration to first ambulation; opioid consumption; and related adverse events.
RESULTS: Patients administered a LB single-injection ACB (LB-ACB) demonstrated significantly reduced VAS scores at static and dynamic phases at 24 hours, relative to the ropivacaine single-injection ACB (R-ACB) and control group patients. We recorded a median interquartile range [IQR] of 1 (0.0-2.0 [0-4]) vs. 3 (2.0-4.0 [0-5]) vs. 3 (2.0-4.0 [0-6]) for static pain scores and 2.5 (1.0-3.25 [0-5]) vs. 4 (4.0-5.0 [2-7]) vs. 5 (4.0-6.0 [3-7]) for dynamic pain scores (P<0.001). Both LB-ACB and R-ACB groups showed lower pain scores at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively versus control (P<0.05). Time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged in the LB group, and LB-ACB also improved early quadriceps strength and knee ROM. No significant adverse events or motor blockade occurred.
CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing TKA, LB single-injection ACB offers a significant analgesic advantage compared to ropivacaine, lasting up to 24 hours. After 48 hours, there is no difference in analgesic effects when compared to the control group.