Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 1993
An evaluation of oral ulcers in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liang G S, Daikos G L, Serfling U, Zhu W Y, Pecoraro M, Leonardi C L, Fischl M A, Penneys N S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with HIV infection can have recurrent and persistent oral ulcers, not attributable to known infectious agents.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate prospectively oral ulcers in patients with HIV infection to determine whether an etiologic agent could be identified.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with HIV infection who had oral ulcers not attributable to known causes had culture of the base and a biopsy specimen taken from the ulcer. Cultures were obtained for herpes simplex and varicella-zoster viruses, mycobacteria, and fungi. By polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis with primer/probe sets for herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, human papillomavirus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, each biopsy specimen was analyzed for the presence of DNA from these organisms. Specimens were also evaluated histologically.
RESULTS: Histoplasmosis was detected histologically in one biopsy specimen, candidiasis in a second, and herpetic changes in a third. Viral cultures were positive for herpes simplex virus 1 in four cases and herpes simplex virus 2 in one case. PCR analysis detected DNA for herpes simplex virus 1 in one case and herpes simplex virus 2 in another; DNA from other pathogens was not identified. In the remaining eight patients, hematoxylin-and-eosin staining revealed eosinophilic ulcers in five cases and nonspecific changes in three cases.
CONCLUSION: The etiologic agent of recurrent or persistent oral ulcers in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex was not identified in 50% of patients. PCR analysis was not useful. Herpes simplex virus or other pathogens were not detected in ulcers containing numerous eosinophils.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate prospectively oral ulcers in patients with HIV infection to determine whether an etiologic agent could be identified.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with HIV infection who had oral ulcers not attributable to known causes had culture of the base and a biopsy specimen taken from the ulcer. Cultures were obtained for herpes simplex and varicella-zoster viruses, mycobacteria, and fungi. By polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis with primer/probe sets for herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, human papillomavirus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, each biopsy specimen was analyzed for the presence of DNA from these organisms. Specimens were also evaluated histologically.
RESULTS: Histoplasmosis was detected histologically in one biopsy specimen, candidiasis in a second, and herpetic changes in a third. Viral cultures were positive for herpes simplex virus 1 in four cases and herpes simplex virus 2 in one case. PCR analysis detected DNA for herpes simplex virus 1 in one case and herpes simplex virus 2 in another; DNA from other pathogens was not identified. In the remaining eight patients, hematoxylin-and-eosin staining revealed eosinophilic ulcers in five cases and nonspecific changes in three cases.
CONCLUSION: The etiologic agent of recurrent or persistent oral ulcers in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex was not identified in 50% of patients. PCR analysis was not useful. Herpes simplex virus or other pathogens were not detected in ulcers containing numerous eosinophils.