MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1010539511429369

Медицинская библиотека · Asia-Pacific journal of public health · 2011

Impulsivity, self-regulation,and pathological video gaming among youth: testing a mediation model.

Liau Albert K, Neo Eng Chuan, Gentile Douglas A, Choo Hyekyung, Sim Timothy, Li Dongdong, Khoo Angeline

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Given the potential negative mental health consequences of pathological video gaming, understanding its etiology may lead to useful treatment developments. The purpose of the study was to examine the influence of impulsive and regulatory processes on pathological video gaming. Study 1 involved 2154 students from 6 primary and 4 secondary schools in Singapore. Study 2 involved 191 students from 2 secondary schools. The results of study 1 and study 2 supported the hypothesis that self-regulation is a mediator between impulsivity and pathological video gaming. Specifically, higher levels of impulsivity was related to lower levels of self-regulation, which in turn was related to higher levels of pathological video gaming. The use of impulsivity and self-regulation in predicting pathological video gaming supports the dual-system model of incorporating both impulsive and reflective systems in the prediction of self-control outcomes. The study highlights the development of self-regulatory resources as a possible avenue for future prevention and treatment research.

Для цитирования: Liau Albert K, Neo Eng Chuan, Gentile Douglas A, Choo Hyekyung, Sim Timothy, Li Dongdong, Khoo Angeline. Impulsivity, self-regulation,and pathological video gaming among youth: testing a mediation model.. Asia-Pacific journal of public health. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1010539511429369.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.