International archives of allergy and immunology · 1999
Antigen-specific, IgE-selective unresponsiveness induced by antigen-liposome conjugates. Comparison of four different conjugation methods for the coupling of antigen to liposome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nakano Y, Mori M, Nishinohara S, Takita Y, Naito S, Horino A, Kato H, Taneichi M, Ami Y, Suzaki Y, Komuro K, Uchida T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that ovalbumin (OVA) coupled with liposome via glutaraldehyde (GA) induced OVA-specific- and IgE-selective unresponsiveness in mice.
METHODS: In this study, OVA-liposome conjugates were made using four different coupling protocols: via GA, N-(6-maleimidocaproyloxy) succinimide (EMCS), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and N-succimidyl-3(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) and the induction of antigen-specific IgG and IgE antibody production was investigated for each. In addition, antigen-specific cytokine production by spleen cells of mice immunized either with OVA-liposome or with OVA adsorbed with aluminum hydroxide was investigated.
RESULTS: OVA-liposome conjugates coupled via GA or DSS did not induce anti-OVA IgE antibody production but induced substantial anti-OVA IgG antibody production. On the other hand, the induction of anti-OVA IgE unresponsiveness by OVA-liposome conjugates coupled via EMCS or SPDP was incomplete. The amount of interleukin 4 (IL-4) produced by spleen cells stimulated in vitro with OVA correlated well with anti-OVA IgE antibody production in donor mice. However, the production of no other cytokine, i.e., IL-2, IL-5, IL-10 or interferon-gamma, was correlated with in vivo IgE antibody production.
CONCLUSION: OVA-liposome coupled via GA or DSS induced complete suppression of anti-OVA IgE production. The results in this study further suggest that the regulation of IgE antibody production does not necessarily correlate with so-called Th1 cytokine production.
METHODS: In this study, OVA-liposome conjugates were made using four different coupling protocols: via GA, N-(6-maleimidocaproyloxy) succinimide (EMCS), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and N-succimidyl-3(2-pyridyldithio)propionate (SPDP) and the induction of antigen-specific IgG and IgE antibody production was investigated for each. In addition, antigen-specific cytokine production by spleen cells of mice immunized either with OVA-liposome or with OVA adsorbed with aluminum hydroxide was investigated.
RESULTS: OVA-liposome conjugates coupled via GA or DSS did not induce anti-OVA IgE antibody production but induced substantial anti-OVA IgG antibody production. On the other hand, the induction of anti-OVA IgE unresponsiveness by OVA-liposome conjugates coupled via EMCS or SPDP was incomplete. The amount of interleukin 4 (IL-4) produced by spleen cells stimulated in vitro with OVA correlated well with anti-OVA IgE antibody production in donor mice. However, the production of no other cytokine, i.e., IL-2, IL-5, IL-10 or interferon-gamma, was correlated with in vivo IgE antibody production.
CONCLUSION: OVA-liposome coupled via GA or DSS induced complete suppression of anti-OVA IgE production. The results in this study further suggest that the regulation of IgE antibody production does not necessarily correlate with so-called Th1 cytokine production.