Patient education and counseling · 2024
The effectiveness of a transtheoretical model-based smoking cessation intervention for rural smokers: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Yin-Hui, Fu Chiung-Hui, Hsu Mei-Hsiu, Okoli Chizimuzo, Guo Su-Er
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking is highly prevalent, despite being a primary preventable cause of disease and mortality. This study examined the effect of a Transtheoretical Model (TTM)-based psychoeducational intervention for smoking cessation (SC) on knowledge, SC-related parameters, and progression through the TTM stages of change among rural smokers.
METHODS: This quasi-experimental study recruited 200 smokers from an outpatient clinic. The comparison group was recruited before the experimental group to address possible self-selection bias. Structured questionnaires were administered pre- and post-intervention (three months) and at follow-up (six months).
RESULTS: A generalised estimation equation model indicated that the TTM-based intervention significantly increased participants' SC-knowledge and improved progression through TTM stages by the six-month follow-up. No significant group differences were found in self-efficacy and nicotine dependence scores or daily cigarette consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: A TTM-based intervention enhances SC-knowledge and fosters progress through change stages. However, it does not directly impact nicotine dependence or cigarette consumption. Outpatient settings may employ TTM-based programmes for SC education and motivation. Detecting anticipated effects may require a longer intervention duration exceeding six months.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Such TTM-based programmes may facilitate SC-knowledge and motivation in outpatient settings. Further research to comprehend patients' context and experiences during the stages of change is required.
METHODS: This quasi-experimental study recruited 200 smokers from an outpatient clinic. The comparison group was recruited before the experimental group to address possible self-selection bias. Structured questionnaires were administered pre- and post-intervention (three months) and at follow-up (six months).
RESULTS: A generalised estimation equation model indicated that the TTM-based intervention significantly increased participants' SC-knowledge and improved progression through TTM stages by the six-month follow-up. No significant group differences were found in self-efficacy and nicotine dependence scores or daily cigarette consumption.
CONCLUSIONS: A TTM-based intervention enhances SC-knowledge and fosters progress through change stages. However, it does not directly impact nicotine dependence or cigarette consumption. Outpatient settings may employ TTM-based programmes for SC education and motivation. Detecting anticipated effects may require a longer intervention duration exceeding six months.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Such TTM-based programmes may facilitate SC-knowledge and motivation in outpatient settings. Further research to comprehend patients' context and experiences during the stages of change is required.