MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102756

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of health economics · 2023

Have recreational marijuana laws undermined public health progress on adult tobacco use?

Dave Dhaval, Liang Yang, Pesko Michael F, Phillips Serena, Sabia Joseph J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Public health experts caution that legalization of recreational marijuana may normalize smoking and undermine the decades-long achievements of tobacco control policy. However, very little is known about the impact of recreational marijuana laws (RMLs) on adult tobacco use. Using newly available data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) and dynamic difference-in-differences and discrete-time hazard approaches, we find that RML adoption increases prior-month marijuana use among adults ages 18-and-older by 2-percentage-points, driven by an increase in marijuana initiation among prior non-users. However, this increase in adult marijuana use does not extend to tobacco use. Rather, we find that RML adoption is associated with a lagged reduction in electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use, consistent with the hypothesis that ENDS and marijuana are substitutes. Moreover, auxiliary analyses from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) show that RML adoption is associated with a reduction in adult cigarette smoking. We conclude that RMLs may generate tobacco-related health benefits.

Для цитирования: Dave Dhaval, Liang Yang, Pesko Michael F, Phillips Serena, Sabia Joseph J. Have recreational marijuana laws undermined public health progress on adult tobacco use?. Journal of health economics. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102756.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.