MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104091

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gerontology and geriatrics · 2020

Efficacy and safety of valproic acid in dementia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Liu Jia, Wang Lu-Ning

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

The neuroprotective effect of valproic acid has been observed in the animal models of neurodegeneration, which suggests it as a potential candidate for clinical trials. In this paper, we aimed to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of valproic acid in the treatment of dementia.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure until March 2020 for the eligible randomized controlled trials, as well as the unpublished and ongoing trials. We pooled the results using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included seven studies with 770 randomized patients with dementia, which compared valproic acid with placebo. Indeed, there were no significant differences found in the scores of Mini-mental State Examination, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory and number of patients with adverse events. Valproic acid is generally well-tolerated in patients with dementia, even in long-term therapy for 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient evidences are found to support valproic acid in the treatment of dementia for cognitive, psychiatric symptoms or disease-modifying. The anticipations for a success in the trial of valproic acid for dementia in the future look not optimistic based on the available evidence.

Для цитирования: Liu Jia, Wang Lu-Ning. Efficacy and safety of valproic acid in dementia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104091.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.