American journal of audiology · 2016
Efficiency of Melatonin as Compared to Pentobarbital for Audiometry Brainstem Response in Children With Associated Disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guerlain Joanne, Paul Antoine, Rouillon Isabelle, Parodi Marine, Garabedian Erea Noel, Loundon Natalie
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Outpatient pediatric audiometry brainstem response (ABR) uses various techniques (no drug, hydroxyzine, pentobarbital, melatonin). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of melatonin as compared to pentobarbital in children with associated disorders.
METHOD: This was a retrospective study that took place in a tertiary care center. Eighty-three children (34 girls and 49 boys) had performed ABR under pentobarbital (GPent) or melatonin (GMel) between 2013 and 2014 and were included. All children had associated neurological or behavioral disorders or had failed a previous ABR using another technique. Success rate, defined as completed binaural investigation, delay, and duration of sleep (minutes), as well as side effects, were compared between GPent and GMel.
RESULTS: There were 56 patients in GMel and 27 in GPent, with a mean age at test of 3 years and 10 months (1-13 years) and 4 years and 1 month (1-14.5 years), respectively. Success rate was 76.8% and 88.8%, respectively (p > .05), sleep duration was 23 and 153 min (p < .0001), and mean delay was 35 and 54 min. No side effects have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin is a drug widely used, particularly for electroencephalogram in children. Sleep duration allowed a success rate that was comparable to pentobarbital. Melatonin seems to be an efficient alternative to pentobarbital for pediatric ABR.
METHOD: This was a retrospective study that took place in a tertiary care center. Eighty-three children (34 girls and 49 boys) had performed ABR under pentobarbital (GPent) or melatonin (GMel) between 2013 and 2014 and were included. All children had associated neurological or behavioral disorders or had failed a previous ABR using another technique. Success rate, defined as completed binaural investigation, delay, and duration of sleep (minutes), as well as side effects, were compared between GPent and GMel.
RESULTS: There were 56 patients in GMel and 27 in GPent, with a mean age at test of 3 years and 10 months (1-13 years) and 4 years and 1 month (1-14.5 years), respectively. Success rate was 76.8% and 88.8%, respectively (p > .05), sleep duration was 23 and 153 min (p < .0001), and mean delay was 35 and 54 min. No side effects have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Melatonin is a drug widely used, particularly for electroencephalogram in children. Sleep duration allowed a success rate that was comparable to pentobarbital. Melatonin seems to be an efficient alternative to pentobarbital for pediatric ABR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAudiometry, Evoked ResponseCentral Nervous System DepressantsChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleHearing LossHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfantMaleMelatoninMental DisordersNervous System DiseasesPentobarbitalRetrospective StudiesTime Factors