MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/pcc.0000000000000147

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2014

The safety of propofol sedation for elective nonintubated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.

Rajasekaran Surender, Hackbarth Richard M, Davis Alan T, Kopec John S, Cloney Deborah L, Fitzgerald Robert K, Hassan Nabil E, Ndika Akunne N, Cornelius Kathleen, McCullough Allison, Sanfilippo Dominic

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of deep sedation provided by pediatric intensivists for elective nonintubated esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

The sedation program at the Helen DeVos Children's Hospital.

PATIENTS: A 4-year retrospective analysis was done on all outpatient elective pediatric esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures performed in an intensivist run sedation program. Safety was examined by reviewing the occurrence of minor and major adverse effects during esophagogastroduodenoscopy sedation. Interventions were studied and reported.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

During the study period, 12,447 sedations were performed by the pediatric sedation program for various procedures. Two thousand one hundred forty-seven patients received 2,325 sedations (18.6%) for esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed for various indications. During the same time period, 53 (one for every 40 esophagogastroduodenoscopy sedations) were screened, found unsuitable for nonintubated sedation, and referred for general anesthesia. There were 2,254 sedations with propofol, 65 methohexital, five ketamine, and one fentanyl/midazolam sedation. Propofol sedation proved safe with a 2.1% prevalence of minor adverse events and no major events. Methohexital, on the other hand, had higher rate (p < 0.001) of minor events and one patient developed an anaphylactic reaction to its use. Regression analysis showed that other sedative agents were 8.6 times more likely to be associated with complications than propofol (odds ratio, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.1-18.2; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that deep sedation for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopies can be provided safely in the appropriately screened patient by nonanesthesiologist physicians in a sedation program. These data suggest that propofol is a safe and effective agent for esophagogastroduodenoscopy sedation.

Для цитирования: Rajasekaran Surender, Hackbarth Richard M, Davis Alan T, Kopec John S, Cloney Deborah L, Fitzgerald Robert K, Hassan Nabil E, Ndika Akunne N, Cornelius Kathleen, McCullough Allison, Sanfilippo Dominic. The safety of propofol sedation for elective nonintubated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in pediatric patients.. Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. 2014. DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000000147.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.