MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Quality in primary care · 2012

Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team.

Clarke David, Hawkins Rebecca, Sadler Euan, Harding Geoffrey, Forster Anne, McKevitt Christopher, Godfrey Mary, Monaghan Josie, Farrin Amanda

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Interdisciplinary health research (IDHR) is increasingly encouraged and is often a specific requirement for research grants provided by health research funding councils worldwide. There is consensus that research expertise and scholarship from a diverse range of disciplines are necessary to examine questions relating to complex health and social concerns for which single disciplinary approaches have been found inadequate.

METHODS

This paper reports on the experiences of an interdisciplinary process evaluation research team working in the field of stroke care.

RESULTS

Realising the perceived benefits is less than straightforward; setting up and conducting IDHR can present researchers with a range of challenges at a strategic, practical and individual level. We identify how differences in disciplinary perspectives and skills impacted on our research practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst initially challenging, our different approaches to the research problem and the methods to address it, expanded conceptual and methodological understanding and proved of benefit for the research team and the study outputs.

Для цитирования: Clarke David, Hawkins Rebecca, Sadler Euan, Harding Geoffrey, Forster Anne, McKevitt Christopher, Godfrey Mary, Monaghan Josie, Farrin Amanda. Interdisciplinary health research: perspectives from a process evaluation research team.. Quality in primary care. 2012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.