British journal of anaesthesia · 2006
The effect of melatonin on sedation of children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sury M R J, Fairweather K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Melatonin may induce a natural sleepiness and improve predictability of sedation drugs. We have investigated its clinical value in children sedated for magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: In a stratified randomized double-blind study, 98 children received either melatonin or placebo 10 min before they were sedated with a standard oral regimen. Children >5 and <15 kg received chloral hydrate and those >or=15 and <40 kg had a combination of temazepam with droperidol (T&D). The doses of melatonin were 3 and 6 mg, respectively. One observer recorded the time taken to reach criteria for deep sedation, sedation failure and other sedation-related events.
RESULTS: In the chloral hydrate group (n=50) 50% were deeply sedated by 31 min after melatonin and 40 min after placebo (P=0.57). There were zero and 1 failures, respectively. The geometric mean time taken to reach deep sedation was 39 min in both subgroups. In the T&D group (n=48) 50% were deeply sedated by 70 min in both subgroups (two failures in each); geometric mean times were 68 and 71 min, respectively (P=0.58). Children closed their eyes slightly earlier after melatonin (respective geometric means 42 vs 48, P=0.17), and took slightly longer to achieve discharge criteria (146 vs 135, P=0.47).
CONCLUSION: In these doses and clinical conditions, melatonin did not contribute to sedation of children.
METHODS: In a stratified randomized double-blind study, 98 children received either melatonin or placebo 10 min before they were sedated with a standard oral regimen. Children >5 and <15 kg received chloral hydrate and those >or=15 and <40 kg had a combination of temazepam with droperidol (T&D). The doses of melatonin were 3 and 6 mg, respectively. One observer recorded the time taken to reach criteria for deep sedation, sedation failure and other sedation-related events.
RESULTS: In the chloral hydrate group (n=50) 50% were deeply sedated by 31 min after melatonin and 40 min after placebo (P=0.57). There were zero and 1 failures, respectively. The geometric mean time taken to reach deep sedation was 39 min in both subgroups. In the T&D group (n=48) 50% were deeply sedated by 70 min in both subgroups (two failures in each); geometric mean times were 68 and 71 min, respectively (P=0.58). Children closed their eyes slightly earlier after melatonin (respective geometric means 42 vs 48, P=0.17), and took slightly longer to achieve discharge criteria (146 vs 135, P=0.47).
CONCLUSION: In these doses and clinical conditions, melatonin did not contribute to sedation of children.