Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2020
Current State of Nutrition Education in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Programs in the United States and Canada.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
De Souza Bradley J, Callif Charles, Staffa Steven J, Mehta Nilesh M, Wolbrink Traci A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To assess the current state of nutrition education provided during pediatric critical care medicine fellowship.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Program directors and fellows from pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs in America and Canada.
SUBJECTS: Seventy current pediatric critical care medicine fellows and twenty-five pediatric critical care medicine fellowship program directors were invited to participate.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were asked demographic questions related to their fellowship programs, currently utilized teaching methods, perceptions regarding adequacy and effectiveness of current nutrition education, and levels of fellow independence, comfort, confidence, and expectations in caring for the nutritional needs of patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were sent to randomly selected program directors and fellows enrolled in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs in America and Canada. Twenty program directors (80%) and 60 fellows (86%) responded. Ninety-five percent of programs (19/20) delivered a formal nutrition curriculum; no curriculum was longer than 5 hours per academic year. Self-reported fellow comfort with nutrition topics did not improve over the course of fellowship (p = 0.03), with the exception of nutritional aspects of special diets. Sixty-five percent of programs did not hold fellows responsible for writing daily parenteral nutrition prescriptions. There was an inverse relationship between total number of fellows in a pediatric critical care medicine program and levels of comfort in ability to provide parenteral nutrition support (p = 0.01). Program directors perceived their nutritional curriculum to be more effective than did their fellows (p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education was reported as highly underrepresented in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship curricula. The majority of programs rely on allied health care professionals to prescribe parenteral nutrition, which may influence trainee independence in the provision of nutritional therapies. Improving the format of current nutrition curriculums, by relying on more active teaching methods, may improve the delivery and efficacy of nutrition education. The impact of novel training interventions on improving the competency and safety of enteral and parenteral nutrition delivery in the PICU must be further examined.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Program directors and fellows from pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs in America and Canada.
SUBJECTS: Seventy current pediatric critical care medicine fellows and twenty-five pediatric critical care medicine fellowship program directors were invited to participate.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants were asked demographic questions related to their fellowship programs, currently utilized teaching methods, perceptions regarding adequacy and effectiveness of current nutrition education, and levels of fellow independence, comfort, confidence, and expectations in caring for the nutritional needs of patients.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Surveys were sent to randomly selected program directors and fellows enrolled in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship programs in America and Canada. Twenty program directors (80%) and 60 fellows (86%) responded. Ninety-five percent of programs (19/20) delivered a formal nutrition curriculum; no curriculum was longer than 5 hours per academic year. Self-reported fellow comfort with nutrition topics did not improve over the course of fellowship (p = 0.03), with the exception of nutritional aspects of special diets. Sixty-five percent of programs did not hold fellows responsible for writing daily parenteral nutrition prescriptions. There was an inverse relationship between total number of fellows in a pediatric critical care medicine program and levels of comfort in ability to provide parenteral nutrition support (p = 0.01). Program directors perceived their nutritional curriculum to be more effective than did their fellows (p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Nutrition education was reported as highly underrepresented in pediatric critical care medicine fellowship curricula. The majority of programs rely on allied health care professionals to prescribe parenteral nutrition, which may influence trainee independence in the provision of nutritional therapies. Improving the format of current nutrition curriculums, by relying on more active teaching methods, may improve the delivery and efficacy of nutrition education. The impact of novel training interventions on improving the competency and safety of enteral and parenteral nutrition delivery in the PICU must be further examined.