Pediatric emergency care · 1988
A comparison of four techniques to establish intraosseous infusion.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wagner M B, McCabe J B
Аннотация
This study was designed to determine whether the success rate in establishing intraosseous infusion (IOI) varied with four different types of needles--standard hypodermic, spinal, bone marrow, and Turkel intraosseous infusion needle. Twenty-four second-year residents from various specialties, without prior training or experience in the technique, participated in the study. Each participant attempted to establish an intraosseous infusion in a randomly assigned limb of an anesthetized piglet, using each needle in a randomly assigned order. The overall success rate was 67.7%. Success ratios varied between needles: hypodermic 54%, spinal 75%, bone marrow 75%, and Turkel 67%. Utilizing Cochran's Q-test, there was no statistical difference in success rates between needle types. However, in cases where the resident was successful with all four needles, the average time to successful infusion was significantly less for bone marrow needles.