Disability and rehabilitation · 2022
Self-determination and co-operation in supported mealtimes involving people with severe intellectual disabilities.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nicholson Clare, Finlay W Mick L, Stagg Steven
Аннотация
PURPOSE: People with severe intellectual disabilities are often supported during mealtimes. However, little information exists about how they and care staff co-ordinate their mealtime behaviours.
METHOD: Four people with severe intellectual disabilities and 12 members of care staff participated in this research. Video data were collected from two services for people with intellectual disabilities. Approximately 30 eating or drinking interactions were filmed, totalling approximately 9.5 h of footage. This footage was analysed using conversation analysis (CA). Ethnographic notes were made. CA is a fine-grained systematic approach which allows examination of how mealtimes are achieved, looking closely at verbal and non-verbal behaviours.
RESULTS: Results show how people with severe intellectual disabilities can demonstrate whether they are ready, or not, for a mouthful of food or drink despite their limited language abilities. Ways in which readiness and unreadiness were demonstrated are outlined and staff responses are also considered.
CONCLUSIONS: There are wider implications for self-determination among people with severe intellectual disabilities. Examples provided suggest that people with severe intellectual disabilities can, and do, make decisions about how fast they eat and when they prefer to complete other activities. Respecting these decisions, carers better support the autonomy of individuals with severe intellectual disabilities.
METHOD: Four people with severe intellectual disabilities and 12 members of care staff participated in this research. Video data were collected from two services for people with intellectual disabilities. Approximately 30 eating or drinking interactions were filmed, totalling approximately 9.5 h of footage. This footage was analysed using conversation analysis (CA). Ethnographic notes were made. CA is a fine-grained systematic approach which allows examination of how mealtimes are achieved, looking closely at verbal and non-verbal behaviours.
RESULTS: Results show how people with severe intellectual disabilities can demonstrate whether they are ready, or not, for a mouthful of food or drink despite their limited language abilities. Ways in which readiness and unreadiness were demonstrated are outlined and staff responses are also considered.
CONCLUSIONS: There are wider implications for self-determination among people with severe intellectual disabilities. Examples provided suggest that people with severe intellectual disabilities can, and do, make decisions about how fast they eat and when they prefer to complete other activities. Respecting these decisions, carers better support the autonomy of individuals with severe intellectual disabilities.