Clozapine for Drug-Refractory Irritability in Individuals with Developmental Disability.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
In this case series, we describe the acute clinical impact and tolerability of rapid titration of clozapine for treatment of refractory irritability in five hospitalized youth with developmental disability. We offer this descriptive report in an effort to expand the evidence base guiding treatment of refractory aggression in this population.
METHODS
Five youth with developmental disability and severe irritability were admitted to a 10-bed psychiatric crisis stabilization unit where they received thorough psychiatric and medical evaluation. Informed consent was obtained in each case, and each patient underwent rapid titration onto clozapine. Clozapine monitoring guidelines were followed for all patients throughout treatment, and clinical severity at baseline and improvement with treatment was measured by use of the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I).
RESULTS
One female and four males diagnosed with developmental disability and at least one other psychiatric diagnosis, mean age of 13.1 ± 2.1 years, and mean CGI-S at baseline of 5.8, each received clozapine treatment by rapid titration. The mean therapeutic total daily dose of clozapine was 380 ± 200 mg. All patients demonstrated acute clinical improvement with the mean final CGI-I of 2.0, or "much improved."
CONCLUSION
These initial results support the potential utility of clozapine rapid titration for treatment of severe refractory irritability in youth with developmental disability. These patients tolerated clozapine treatment in the short term. Future studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the long-term safety of clozapine treatment in this population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.