What is the situation of human T cell lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) in Africa? Origin and dissemination of genomic subtypes.

Human T cell lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) and its two genomic subtypes, A and B, which differ by 3 to 6% at the nucleotide level (depending on the gene studied), were until recently considered to be endemic only in certain Indian tribes in the Americas and were therefore considered mainly as a "New World virus." First, the evidence of HTLV-II antibodies and later characterization of isolates from sex workers or individuals living in large West and Central African cities suggested that HTLV-II subtype A could have been imported recently in Africa. However, the findings of HTLV-II infection in two Pygmy populations living in remote areas of Zaire and Cameroon suggest that HTLV-II might have been in Africa for a very long time. Furthermore, the discovery of HTLV-II subtype B virus in some of these Pygmies, but also in other individuals from Zaire and within a family in Gabon for three generations, confirms the hypothesis of a very ancient presence of this HTLV-II subtype B on the African continent Recent data indicate also that there exist in Central Africa specific HTLV-II divergent strains including an HTLV-II B variant strain in Gabon. In the context of recent evidence for interspecies transmission in Central and West Africa of HTLV-I/simian T cell lymphotropic virus type I (STLV-I) strains, leading to the two major HTLV-I African subtypes, we would like to suggest that some STLV-II (closely related to HTLV-II subtype B) still exist or might have existed in Central/East Africa. The recent finding of quite divergent primate T cell lymphotropic viruses (PTLVs) in several Pygmy chimpanzees of Zairian origin (PTLV-PP1664 and STLV-PP) and in wild-caught baboons in Eritrea, Ethiopia (PTLV-L), also supports the complementary hypothesis of a yet to be discovered new HTLV-II-related virus in humans. Careful study of the indeterminate Western blot patterns present in some populations in Central Africa strongly suggests that such an exciting possibility exists, thus opening new avenues of research on both the history of primate retroviruses and that of early human groups.