Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2025
Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Adolescents: Family History, Parental Distress, Rearing, and Accommodation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lavell Cassie H, Oar Ella L, Rapee Ronald M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The family environment of adolescents with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) is under researched. The current study aimed to investigate family psychiatric history, as well as parental distress, rearing practices, accommodation of appearance concerns, and appearance messages in a clinical sample of adolescents with BDD.
METHOD: Twenty-six adolescents (12-17 years) with BDD were compared to 27 adolescents with anxiety disorders and 25 adolescents without mental disorders. Adolescents and their primary caregivers completed self-report measures and participated in a discussion task that was independently coded for parental rearing styles.
RESULTS: Parents of adolescents with BDD reported experiencing significantly more emotional distress than parents in the non-clinical group (p = .003, d = 1.02). The majority (92%) of parents in the BDD group reported accommodating their child's appearance concerns and reported performing significantly more frequent appearance accommodations than parents of anxious adolescents (p < .001, d = 1.40) and the non-clinical group (p < .001, d = 1.83). An independent observer rated parents of adolescents with BDD (p = .002, d = 1.19) and anxiety disorders (p = .008, d = 0.87) as more critical than parents in the non-clinical group during a body-image related discussion, but parents of adolescents with BDD were not rated as more critical in other discussion scenarios. There were no significant differences in parental warmth, overprotection, or appearance messages between parents in the BDD group and comparison groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study can inform cognitive-behavioral models of adolescent BDD as well as family-based treatment approaches.
METHOD: Twenty-six adolescents (12-17 years) with BDD were compared to 27 adolescents with anxiety disorders and 25 adolescents without mental disorders. Adolescents and their primary caregivers completed self-report measures and participated in a discussion task that was independently coded for parental rearing styles.
RESULTS: Parents of adolescents with BDD reported experiencing significantly more emotional distress than parents in the non-clinical group (p = .003, d = 1.02). The majority (92%) of parents in the BDD group reported accommodating their child's appearance concerns and reported performing significantly more frequent appearance accommodations than parents of anxious adolescents (p < .001, d = 1.40) and the non-clinical group (p < .001, d = 1.83). An independent observer rated parents of adolescents with BDD (p = .002, d = 1.19) and anxiety disorders (p = .008, d = 0.87) as more critical than parents in the non-clinical group during a body-image related discussion, but parents of adolescents with BDD were not rated as more critical in other discussion scenarios. There were no significant differences in parental warmth, overprotection, or appearance messages between parents in the BDD group and comparison groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study can inform cognitive-behavioral models of adolescent BDD as well as family-based treatment approaches.