MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1494

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of public health · 2001

Poverty, race/ethnicity, and psychiatric disorder: a study of rural children.

Costello E J, Keeler G P, Angold A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the effect of poverty on the prevalence of psychiatric disorder in rural Black and White children.

METHODS

A representative sample of 541 Black children and 379 White children aged 9 to 17 was drawn from 4 predominantly rural counties. Structured interviews with parents and children collected information on psychiatric disorders, absolute and relative poverty, and risk factors for psychiatric disorder.

RESULTS

Three-month prevalence of psychiatric disorder was similar to that found in other community samples (20%). Federal criteria for poverty were met by 18% of the White and 52% of the Black families. Black and White children were exposed to equal numbers of risk factors overall, but the association between poverty and psychopathology was stronger for White children (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1, 4.2) than for Black children (OR = 1.5; 95% CI = 0.9, 2.6). Family history of mental illness, poor parenting, and residential instability mediated this association in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this rural sample, poverty was only weakly associated with child psychiatric disorders. Risk factors for both racial/ethnic groups were family mental illness, multiple moves, lack of parental warmth, lax supervision, and harsh punishment.

Для цитирования: Costello E J, Keeler G P, Angold A. Poverty, race/ethnicity, and psychiatric disorder: a study of rural children.. American journal of public health. 2001. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1494.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.