MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005942

Медицинская библиотека · Critical care medicine · 2023

Prevalence and Characteristics of Diagnostic Error in Pediatric Critical Care: A Multicenter Study.

Cifra Christina L, Custer Jason W, Smith Craig M, Smith Kristen A, Bagdure Dayanand N, Bloxham Jodi, Goldhar Emily, Gorga Stephen M, Hoppe Elizabeth M, Miller Christina D, Pizzo Max, Ramesh Sonali, Riffe Joseph, Robb Katharine, Simone Shari L, Stoll Haley D, Tumulty Jamie Ann, Wall Stephanie E, Wolfe Katie K, Wendt Linder, Ten Eyck Patrick, Landrigan Christopher P, Dawson Jeffrey D, Reisinger Heather Schacht, Singh Hardeep, Herwaldt Loreen A

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Effective interventions to prevent diagnostic error among critically ill children should be informed by diagnostic error prevalence and etiologies. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of diagnostic errors and identify factors associated with error in patients admitted to the PICU.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study using structured medical record review by trained clinicians using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic error (defined as missed opportunities in diagnosis). Cases with potential errors were further reviewed by four pediatric intensivists who made final consensus determinations of diagnostic error occurrence. Demographic, clinical, clinician, and encounter data were also collected.

SETTING

Four academic tertiary-referral PICUs.

PATIENTS: Eight hundred eighty-two randomly selected patients 0-18 years old who were nonelectively admitted to participating PICUs.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Of 882 patient admissions, 13 (1.5%) had a diagnostic error up to 7 days after PICU admission. Infections (46%) and respiratory conditions (23%) were the most common missed diagnoses. One diagnostic error caused harm with a prolonged hospital stay. Common missed diagnostic opportunities included failure to consider the diagnosis despite a suggestive history (69%) and failure to broaden diagnostic testing (69%). Unadjusted analysis identified more diagnostic errors in patients with atypical presentations (23.1% vs 3.6%, p = 0.011), neurologic chief complaints (46.2% vs 18.8%, p = 0.024), admitting intensivists greater than or equal to 45 years old (92.3% vs 65.1%, p = 0.042), admitting intensivists with more service weeks/year (mean 12.8 vs 10.9 wk, p = 0.031), and diagnostic uncertainty on admission (77% vs 25.1%, p < 0.001). Generalized linear mixed models determined that atypical presentation (odds ratio [OR] 4.58; 95% CI, 0.94-17.1) and diagnostic uncertainty on admission (OR 9.67; 95% CI, 2.86-44.0) were significantly associated with diagnostic error.

CONCLUSIONS

Among critically ill children, 1.5% had a diagnostic error up to 7 days after PICU admission. Diagnostic errors were associated with atypical presentations and diagnostic uncertainty on admission, suggesting possible targets for intervention.

Для цитирования: Cifra Christina L, Custer Jason W, Smith Craig M, Smith Kristen A, Bagdure Dayanand N, Bloxham Jodi, Goldhar Emily, Gorga Stephen M, Hoppe Elizabeth M, Miller Christina D, Pizzo Max, Ramesh Sonali, Riffe Joseph, Robb Katharine, Simone Shari L, Stoll Haley D, Tumulty Jamie Ann, Wall Stephanie E, Wolfe Katie K, Wendt Linder, Ten Eyck Patrick, Landrigan Christopher P, Dawson Jeffrey D, Reisinger Heather Schacht, Singh Hardeep, Herwaldt Loreen A. Prevalence and Characteristics of Diagnostic Error in Pediatric Critical Care: A Multicenter Study.. Critical care medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005942.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.