MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/1753466620963019

Медицинская библиотека · Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease · 2020

Definition and retrospective application of a clinical scoring system for COVID-19 triage at presentation.

Duan Jun, Liang Mei, Li Yongpu, Wu Dan, Chen Ying, Gao Shui, Jia Ping, Yang Mei, Xia Wei, Wu Xiaolan, Li Quan, Zuo Fulin, Zhang Yahong, He Yongfang, Nie Jianghua, Zhou Wenxiu, Fu Xueqin, Peng Xiaobin, Ma Zhoujun, Fu Xiaofeng, Zeng Lingwei, You Wenyi, Fang Yuan, Zhu Lingmei, Liu Ping

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A simple scoring system for triage of suspected patients with COVID-19 is lacking.

METHODS

A multi-disciplinary team developed a screening score taking into account epidemiology history, clinical feature, radiographic feature, and routine blood test. At fever clinics, the screening score was used to identify the patients with moderate to high probability of COVID-19 among all the suspected patients. The patients with moderate to high probability of COVID-19 were allocated to a single room in an isolation ward with level-3 protection. And those with low probability were allocated to a single room in a general ward with level-2 protection. At the isolation ward, the screening score was used to identify the confirmed and probable cases after two consecutive real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. The data in the People's Hospital of Changshou District were used for internal validation and those in the People's Hospital of Yubei District for external validation.

RESULTS

We enrolled 76 and 40 patients for internal and external validation, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, the area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics (AUC) was 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.99] for the diagnosis of moderate to high probability of cases among all the suspected patients. Using 60 as cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 93%, respectively. In the isolation ward, the AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83-0.99) for the diagnosis of confirmed and probable cases. Using 90 as cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity were 78% and 100%, respectively. These results were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system provides a reference on COVID-19 triage in fever clinics to reduce misdiagnosis and consumption of protective supplies.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Для цитирования: Duan Jun, Liang Mei, Li Yongpu, Wu Dan, Chen Ying, Gao Shui, Jia Ping, Yang Mei, Xia Wei, Wu Xiaolan, Li Quan, Zuo Fulin, Zhang Yahong, He Yongfang, Nie Jianghua, Zhou Wenxiu, Fu Xueqin, Peng Xiaobin, Ma Zhoujun, Fu Xiaofeng, Zeng Lingwei, You Wenyi, Fang Yuan, Zhu Lingmei, Liu Ping. Definition and retrospective application of a clinical scoring system for COVID-19 triage at presentation.. Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1753466620963019.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.