MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s13187-011-0258-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2011

Beliefs about causes of colon cancer by English-as-a-Second-Language Chinese immigrant women to Canada.

McWhirter Jennifer Elizabeth, Todd Laura E, Hoffman-Goetz Laurie

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Colon cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death for Canadians. Immigrants underutilize screening and may be at greater risk of late stage diagnosis and death from the disease. This mixed-methods study investigated the self-reported causes of colon cancer by 66 English-as-a-Second-Language Chinese immigrant women to Canada after reading a fact sheet which listed two causes of colon cancer (polyps and cause unknown) and six ways to help prevent colon cancer (lifestyle, diet, weight, smoking, alcohol, and screening). Women correctly named or described both causes (6.1%) or one cause (22.7%), could not name or describe either cause (19.7%), or named or described causes not included on the fact sheet (54.5%). The most common causes reported by participants were "risk factors": diet (53.0%), family history (28.8%), and lifestyle (22.7%). Women confused cause with risk factor and infrequently mentioned screening. Possible reasons for their reported beliefs are discussed.

Для цитирования: McWhirter Jennifer Elizabeth, Todd Laura E, Hoffman-Goetz Laurie. Beliefs about causes of colon cancer by English-as-a-Second-Language Chinese immigrant women to Canada.. Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0258-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.