Chest · 2002
Evaluation of bronchial constriction in children with cystic fibrosis after inhaling two different preparations of tobramycin.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alothman Ghassan A, Alsaadi Muslim M, Ho Bernard L, Ho Sharon L, Dupuis Annie, Corey Mary, Coates Allan L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study evaluated the risk of bronchoconstriction with two preparations of inhaled tobramycin in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without airway hyperreactivity.
DESIGN: Of 19 children with CF (age range, 7 to 16 years) with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease, 10 children were at high risk (HR) for bronchospasm (family history of asthma and previous response to bronchodilators) and 9 children were at low risk (LR) for bronchospasm (no family history of asthma or previous response to bronchodilators). Two solutions of tobramycin were administered: (1) 80 mg in a 2-mL vial diluted with 2 mL of saline solution containing the preservatives phenol and bisulfites (IV preparation); and (2) 300 mg in a preservative-free preparation in a 5-mL solution. Following a bronchodilator-free period of 12 h, the patients inhaled either one or the other preparation in random order on two different occasions, 2 weeks apart.
RESULTS: Prechallenge and postchallenge results for the LR group showed a percentage of fall in FEV(1) (DeltaFEV(1)) of 12 +/- 9% (mean +/- SD) for the IV preparation, compared to 4 +/- 5% for the preservative-free preparation (p = 0.046). An DeltaFEV(1) of > 10% was seen in six of nine patients for the IV preparation and in one of nine patients for preservative-free preparation. For the HR group, the DeltaFEV(1) was 17 +/- 13% for the IV-preparation group, compared to 16 +/- 12% for the preservative-free group (p = 0.4). In this group, equal numbers of patients (8 of 10 patients) had an DeltaFEV(1) > 10% after inhaling each preparation. The largest DeltaFEV(1) was 44% (HR group with the preservative-free preparation that forced the early termination of inhalation).
CONCLUSIONS: Both preparations caused significant bronchoconstriction in the HR group, and the preservative-containing IV preparation caused more bronchospasm in LR group than the preservative-free solution. Heightened airway reactivity in children with CF places them at risk of bronchospasm from inhalation therapy.
DESIGN: Of 19 children with CF (age range, 7 to 16 years) with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease, 10 children were at high risk (HR) for bronchospasm (family history of asthma and previous response to bronchodilators) and 9 children were at low risk (LR) for bronchospasm (no family history of asthma or previous response to bronchodilators). Two solutions of tobramycin were administered: (1) 80 mg in a 2-mL vial diluted with 2 mL of saline solution containing the preservatives phenol and bisulfites (IV preparation); and (2) 300 mg in a preservative-free preparation in a 5-mL solution. Following a bronchodilator-free period of 12 h, the patients inhaled either one or the other preparation in random order on two different occasions, 2 weeks apart.
RESULTS: Prechallenge and postchallenge results for the LR group showed a percentage of fall in FEV(1) (DeltaFEV(1)) of 12 +/- 9% (mean +/- SD) for the IV preparation, compared to 4 +/- 5% for the preservative-free preparation (p = 0.046). An DeltaFEV(1) of > 10% was seen in six of nine patients for the IV preparation and in one of nine patients for preservative-free preparation. For the HR group, the DeltaFEV(1) was 17 +/- 13% for the IV-preparation group, compared to 16 +/- 12% for the preservative-free group (p = 0.4). In this group, equal numbers of patients (8 of 10 patients) had an DeltaFEV(1) > 10% after inhaling each preparation. The largest DeltaFEV(1) was 44% (HR group with the preservative-free preparation that forced the early termination of inhalation).
CONCLUSIONS: Both preparations caused significant bronchoconstriction in the HR group, and the preservative-containing IV preparation caused more bronchospasm in LR group than the preservative-free solution. Heightened airway reactivity in children with CF places them at risk of bronchospasm from inhalation therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, InhalationAdolescentBronchial HyperreactivityBronchoconstrictionChildCross-Over StudiesCystic FibrosisDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMalePneumonia, BacterialPreservatives, PharmaceuticalPseudomonas InfectionsPseudomonas aeruginosaRisk FactorsSpirometryTobramycin