MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.039

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2016

Diagnostic criteria for and clinical review of melanonychia in Korean patients.

Jin Hyunju, Kim Jeong-Min, Kim Gun-Wook, Song Margaret, Kim Hoon-Soo, Ko Hyun-Chang, Kim Byung-Soo, Kim Moon-Bum

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Melanonychia may be the presenting sign of ungual melanoma. However, there are insufficient basic clinical data for melanonychia in Korean patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify basic clinical data and devise a classification algorithm for melanonychia.

METHODS

In all, 275 patients with melanonychia who visited our clinic from January 2002 to August 2014 were included in this study. We reviewed medical records, clinical and dermoscopic photographs, and histopathologic findings and we assessed demographics (eg, age); medical (eg, systemic diseases), family, and trauma (eg, nail biting) history; and physical findings (eg, affected number and site).

RESULTS

The 5 most common causes of melanonychia in Korean patients were subungual hemorrhage (29.1%), nail matrix nevus (21.8%), trauma-induced pigmentation (14.5%), nail apparatus lentigo (11.6%), and ethnic-type nail pigmentation (8.0%). Melanoma was diagnosed in 6.2% of patients. Ethnic-type nail pigmentation was commonly identified.

LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study from a single center.

CONCLUSION

We propose a revised diagnostic algorithm for melanonychia to assist in the evaluation of this condition.

Для цитирования: Jin Hyunju, Kim Jeong-Min, Kim Gun-Wook, Song Margaret, Kim Hoon-Soo, Ko Hyun-Chang, Kim Byung-Soo, Kim Moon-Bum. Diagnostic criteria for and clinical review of melanonychia in Korean patients.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.