MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jep.2011.12.040

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of ethnopharmacology · 2012

Validation of self-reported khat chewing amongst khat chewers: an exploratory study.

Kassim Saba, Hawash Aamenah, Johnston Atholl, Croucher Ray

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Khat chewing amongst the UK communities originating from Yemen and the East African coast is suggested to create dependency through its main stimulant components (cathinone, norephedrine and norpseudoephedrine) on the central nervous system.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: To validate self-reported khat chewing behaviours by measuring levels of cathinone, norephedrine and norpseudoephedrine in saliva and to explore their associations with self-reported khat chewing dependency.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Face-to-face interviews were conducted amongst 30 male UK-resident khat chewers. Saliva samples were collected from each participant and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) employed to extract and quantify the levels of the biomarkers.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) for cathinone and the composite norephedrine and norpseudoephedrine levels were 33.93 (±39.20) and 29.28 (±26.32)μg/mL respectively. These biomarkers were significantly associated (p≤0.05) with khat chewing dependency.

CONCLUSIONS

Validation of self-reported khat chewing is possible. Khat chewing dependency correlates significantly with biomarker levels in saliva. Replication is required.

Для цитирования: Kassim Saba, Hawash Aamenah, Johnston Atholl, Croucher Ray. Validation of self-reported khat chewing amongst khat chewers: an exploratory study.. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2011.12.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.