MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.chi.0000085754.71002.14

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2003

Reported maltreatment among clinic-referred children: implications for presenting problems, treatment attrition, and long-term outcomes.

Lau Anna S, Weisz John R

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine the treatment implications of a reported history of maltreatment in a sample of 343 children referred to Los Angeles area mental health clinics for emotional and behavioral problems.

METHOD: Child Protective Service records identified 161 of the 343 families as having a documented history of maltreatment. Parent reports of child behavior problems were obtained following clinic intake and at 2-year follow-up, and attrition was assessed via medical records. The authors examined the associations between a history of maltreatment and severity of child presenting problems, treatment attrition, and long-term mental health outcomes.

RESULTS

Compared to other clinic-referred children, youngsters with a history of maltreatment entered treatment with more externalizing behavior problems, were more likely to exit treatment early and without therapist consent, and continued to show greater externalizing problems 2 years later.

CONCLUSIONS

Maltreated children have significant mental health needs that may not be well addressed currently in community mental health clinics.

Для цитирования: Lau Anna S, Weisz John R. Reported maltreatment among clinic-referred children: implications for presenting problems, treatment attrition, and long-term outcomes.. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2003. DOI: 10.1097/01.chi.0000085754.71002.14.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.