Translational vision science & technology · 2025
Discrepancies Between Autofluorescence Imaging Modalities in CNGB3-Associated Achromatopsia and Correlation With Ellipsoid Zone Continuity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akhtar Haseeb N, Lam Chun Fung Jeffrey, Lin Siying, Arno Gavin, Pulido Jose S, Webster Andrew R, Michaelides Michel, Mahroo Omar A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To explore discrepancies on fundus autofluorescence (FAF) obtained with two widely used devices in patients with CNGB3-associated achromatopsia, with respect to the central foveal signal. Secondly, to explore continuity of the foveal ellipsoid zone (EZ) in these patients.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone blue (488 nm; Heidelberg Spectralis) and green (532 nm; Optos) FAF imaging during the same visit were included. The central foveal signal was graded qualitatively as brighter or darker compared to the wider foveal/parafoveal region. Optical coherence tomography images from the same visit were also graded (masked to FAF grading) with respect to foveal EZ continuity.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 females; mean age, 32 ± 19 years) were included. For blue FAF, the central foveal signal was graded darker in all cases. For green FAF, the central fovea was brighter in 11 patients (27%), indicating discordance with blue FAF. The discordant group were significantly younger (P = 0.022). The EZ line was gradable in 40 patients: 22 (55%) had continuous foveal EZ in both eyes; these were younger than those with an interrupted EZ in one or both eyes (P < 0.0001). All patients discordant for FAF images had continuous foveal EZ.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordance occurred between the FAF modalities in more than one-quarter of patients; these patients were significantly younger, and all had a continuous EZ line. Investigating mechanisms of discordance could yield pathophysiological insights.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: FAF platforms are not interchangeable; these findings could inform the design of natural history studies and therapeutic trials for this condition.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone blue (488 nm; Heidelberg Spectralis) and green (532 nm; Optos) FAF imaging during the same visit were included. The central foveal signal was graded qualitatively as brighter or darker compared to the wider foveal/parafoveal region. Optical coherence tomography images from the same visit were also graded (masked to FAF grading) with respect to foveal EZ continuity.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients (24 females; mean age, 32 ± 19 years) were included. For blue FAF, the central foveal signal was graded darker in all cases. For green FAF, the central fovea was brighter in 11 patients (27%), indicating discordance with blue FAF. The discordant group were significantly younger (P = 0.022). The EZ line was gradable in 40 patients: 22 (55%) had continuous foveal EZ in both eyes; these were younger than those with an interrupted EZ in one or both eyes (P < 0.0001). All patients discordant for FAF images had continuous foveal EZ.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordance occurred between the FAF modalities in more than one-quarter of patients; these patients were significantly younger, and all had a continuous EZ line. Investigating mechanisms of discordance could yield pathophysiological insights.
TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: FAF platforms are not interchangeable; these findings could inform the design of natural history studies and therapeutic trials for this condition.