MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157849.16649.6e

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2005

Validity of sleep nasendoscopy in the investigation of sleep related breathing disorders.

Berry S, Roblin G, Williams A, Watkins A, Whittet H B

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To validate the technique of sleep nasendoscopy using target controlled infusion in symptomatic patients and a control group of asymptomatic individuals.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Department of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery and anesthesia in a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Two groups of patients were compared and matched for their body mass index. The first group consisted of 53 patients with a history suggestive of obstructive sleep apnea. The second group consisted of 54 patients with partner-confirmed history of no snoring. These patients were undergoing anesthesia for other reasons. Both groups of patients were free of associated otorhinolaryngologic symptoms.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Assessment of production of snoring or obstruction in patients with no documented history of snoring when sedation was administered as part of general anesthesia using target controlled infusion with propofol.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSIONS

None of the patients in the asymptomatic group snored or obstructed at any level of propofol, and this was clearly significant on comparison with the symptomatic group (P < .001). All of the symptomatic patients were induced to become symptomatic (snoring/obstruction).

Для цитирования: Berry S, Roblin G, Williams A, Watkins A, Whittet H B. Validity of sleep nasendoscopy in the investigation of sleep related breathing disorders.. The Laryngoscope. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000157849.16649.6e.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.