MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3928/0191-3913-19980301-05

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus · 1998

Can congenital nasolacrimal-duct obstruction interfere with visual development? A cohort case control study.

Ellis J D, MacEwen C J, Young J D

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To ascertain if tear film disturbance in congenital nasolacrimal-duct obstruction (CNLDO) interferes with visual maturation.

METHODS

Review of a cohort of children in which the occurrence and duration of CNLDO had been previously documented. Information obtained included acuity, refractive data, and presence or absence of strabismus. The incidence of abnormality in the CNLDO group was compared with that in controls, which were fellow eyes in those children with unilateral obstruction, and all children with no history of CNLDO.

RESULTS

Of 4792 children, visual acuity data were obtained on 2249. There was no difference in the incidence of amblyopia in CNLDO children compared with controls (p < 0.89) nor in the watering eye compared with the fellow eye (p < 0.58). No correlation between refractive error or astigmatism and CNLDO (p < 0.26 and p < 0.32 respectively) was found. Strabismus was no more common in CNLDO than in controls (p < 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no evidence to suggest that visual maturation is adversely affected by allowing spontaneous resolution of CNLDO.

Для цитирования: Ellis J D, MacEwen C J, Young J D. Can congenital nasolacrimal-duct obstruction interfere with visual development? A cohort case control study.. Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. 1998. DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19980301-05.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.