Annales pharmaceutiques francaises · 2018
[Retrocession, a profitable but risky activity].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Laoubi D, Hallouard F, Remy E, Leroy F, Bougle C, Monzat D, Bounoure F
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The retrocession (out-patient dispensing of hospital-reserved drugs)is a pharmaceutical critical activity requiring a care security with a territorial approach. In this drug supply chain, the pharmacist is the last step before the drug administration and the economic profitability is questionable. In this context, a risk mapping and an economic evaluation seem necessary.
METHODS: The risk analysis was conducted with the adverse events collected. The economic study was realised with the point of view of the hospital and with the microcosting method.
RESULTS: Six never events were observed with the risk analysis. The economic study showed that the retrocession was profitable in usual situations with a net margin from 7 to 14€. But, when an exceptional situation occurred as a troubleshooting or the creation of a public deal, the added costs became so important (76 and 85€) that the retrocession was an unbeneficial activity.
CONCLUSION: The retrocession is an activity with a health, legal and economic high risk. In order to improve the healthcare quality and safety, the retrocession must be considered as a coordinated process. It means that the different health professionals must communicate with each other and that the connection between the ambulatory and the hospital care must be efficient.
METHODS: The risk analysis was conducted with the adverse events collected. The economic study was realised with the point of view of the hospital and with the microcosting method.
RESULTS: Six never events were observed with the risk analysis. The economic study showed that the retrocession was profitable in usual situations with a net margin from 7 to 14€. But, when an exceptional situation occurred as a troubleshooting or the creation of a public deal, the added costs became so important (76 and 85€) that the retrocession was an unbeneficial activity.
CONCLUSION: The retrocession is an activity with a health, legal and economic high risk. In order to improve the healthcare quality and safety, the retrocession must be considered as a coordinated process. It means that the different health professionals must communicate with each other and that the connection between the ambulatory and the hospital care must be efficient.