MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Atencion primaria · 1997

[Drug interactions in chronic prescription].

Comet D, Casajuana J, Bordas J M, Fuentes M A, Arnáiz J A, Núñez B, Pou R

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Application of computerized program for detection of potential drug interactions (PDI) in chronic prescriptions in four primary care centers. To evaluate the clinical significance of PDI identified according to clinical criterions.

DESIGN

An observational crossover study.

SETTING

Clutat Vella health district (City of Barcelona).

MEASUREMENTS AND

RESULTS

Using information of Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Farmaceuticos databases and the chronic prescriptions database of the primary care centers, computerized drug-interaction system have been developed for detection of PDI in patients. A panel of primary care physicians and clinical pharmacists developed criteria that were used to evaluate the clinical significance of PDI. 9840 Cards of Authorized Prescription (CAP) were analyzed, 36108 medicaments and 42877 drugs. A total of 2140 patients were involved for a total of 3406 PDI, 21.75% of patients with CAP. Clinical signification for the panel was found in 40.07% of these 3406 PIF; 3.78% were suggest to avoid the association drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PDI with clinical signification are lower than other studies of the literature; it suggest a appropriate knowledge of drug prescription. The application of computerized program make much more easy the detection of adverse drug interactions in chronic prescription.

Для цитирования: Comet D, Casajuana J, Bordas J M, Fuentes M A, Arnáiz J A, Núñez B, Pou R. [Drug interactions in chronic prescription].. Atencion primaria. 1997.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.